From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27594 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2006 08:17:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 27584 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2006 08:17:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cgf.cx (HELO cgf.cx) (24.61.23.223) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:17:52 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 0AD3213C0F8; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 03:17:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:17:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Charles Wilson , wntrmute@users.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Patch(es) for mingw Message-ID: <20060202081748.GF28176@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Charles Wilson , wntrmute@users.sourceforge.net References: <43E1BA4D.3010509@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43E1BA4D.3010509@cwilson.fastmail.fm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:52:45AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >I hope that Dave does not take it amiss if I post the forward-ported >version of his patch here, but I want to keep it here together with my >dependent contributions. He has posted portions of it to this list >before (notably, here: >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-09/msg00205.html), and of >course the full version against 6.3.50.20051116 at the URL at the top of >this email). I don't know if Dave takes it amiss but unless he and you have an assignment with the FSF this really can't be considered for inclusion in gdb. Do you? cgf