From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28059 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2006 23:08:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 28044 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2006 23:08:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:08:29 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0PN75j2007344; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:07:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0PN75qF026229; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:07:05 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0PN74rp001457; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:07:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:08:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200601252307.k0PN74rp001457@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: mark@codesourcery.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <43D7B622.2040409@codesourcery.com> (message from Mark Mitchell on Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:32:18 -0800) Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix LP64 model bug in PPC simulator References: <200601240555.k0O5tGmu007234@sethra.codesourcery.com> <200601241925.k0OJPwwt002920@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <43D68566.4090101@codesourcery.com> <20060124210859.GA26974@nevyn.them.org> <43D6BD0F.6030500@codesourcery.com> <5981.192.87.1.22.1138179926.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <43D7B622.2040409@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00419.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:32:18 -0800 > From: Mark Mitchell > > Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Sorry that I didn't notice it before but can you change natural32 as well? > > Sure -- I'm sorry I missed that. I checked in the attached patch after > confirming that the simulator still worked on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. > > I interpreted your note as an implicit approval of such a change. I > hope that's OK; let me know if that was a breach of protocol, and I'll > back the patch out. It's all-ok! Thanks, Mark