From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-42447-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1009 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2006 21:45:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 996 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2006 21:45:34 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:45:32 +0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) 	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0OLhb1u016775; 	Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:43:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0OLhaPV028737; 	Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:43:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0OLhaO7002831; 	Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:43:36 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:45:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200601242143.k0OLhaO7002831@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: mark@codesourcery.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl,         gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20060124210859.GA26974@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:09:00 -0500)
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix LP64 model bug in PPC simulator
References: <200601240555.k0O5tGmu007234@sethra.codesourcery.com> <200601241925.k0OJPwwt002920@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <43D68566.4090101@codesourcery.com> <20060124210859.GA26974@nevyn.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00380.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:09:00 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:52:06AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > 
> > > Any reason not to just use 'int'?  I'm pretty sure our code base makes
> > > that assumption in a lot of places.
> > 
> > Fine by me.  OK with that change?
> 
> Yes, it is.

Sure, go ahead.