From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6915 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2006 15:00:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 6737 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2006 15:00:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:59:59 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ezxk4-0000z1-CE; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:59:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew STUBBS Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable thread specific breakpoints when thread dies Message-ID: <20060120145956.GA3721@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew STUBBS , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <437A19DE.6040905@st.com> <437B47A1.4040705@st.com> <20051117034811.GB3057@nevyn.them.org> <437CA66B.9060201@st.com> <20060112162659.GA16141@nevyn.them.org> <43C7E466.9080703@st.com> <20060114160611.GA12603@nevyn.them.org> <43CB97A2.20205@st.com> <43CBC6EB.9080904@st.com> <43D0F96E.2030104@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43D0F96E.2030104@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:53:34PM +0000, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > Any opinions anybody? I'll be doing a lot of patch review this afternoon. I'll take another look at it. It doesn't feel like the right place - normally we don't need new calls to prune_thread... maybe we can "push" the death event. (prune_threads -> expensive). -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery