From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Girish Shilamkar <girish@linsyssoft.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] Mark the thread_event breakpoint as "not inserted" before calling thread_mourn_inferior
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060120143507.GA2794@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1137766638.3225.40.camel@krypton>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:47:18PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> > As I suspected something is wrong with your host system, kernel,
> > environment, or similar. You may want to try a few others.
> Thanks for the reply. I tried gdb-6.4 on Fedora Core 3 & 4 and always
> saw that problem. I further tried gdb-6.3 on the same m/c with same
> configuration (only the gdb had changed )on which I had seen this
> problem and it worked fine.
> Then while investigating further about the different behaviour of the
> two gdb's i.e. gdb-6.3 and gdb-6.4 I found one difference that gdb-6.3
> doesn't have a function called thread_db_xfer_partial.
>
> The following call trace is same for both the gdbs
You left out the interesting part of the trace; why is it fetching
registers? My GDB doesn't. Presumably this is something specific to
Red Hat's libthread_db. Does td_thr_validate_p return TD_OK for a
thread which is actually dead?
> #14 0x081305e0 in memory_remove_breakpoint (addr=4626416,
> contents_cache=0x95a7618 "U") at ../../src/gdb/mem-
> break.c:91
> #15 0x080cffdd in remove_breakpoint (b=0x95a7600, is=mark_inserted)
> at ../../src/gdb/breakpoint.c:1452
> #16 0x080d82aa in delete_breakpoint (bpt=0x95a7558)
> at ../../src/gdb/breakpoint.c:6772
> #17 0x080d4258 in remove_thread_event_breakpoints ()
> at ../../src/gdb/breakpoint.c:4295
> #18 0x08096875 in thread_db_mourn_inferior ()
> at ../../src/gdb/linux-thread-db.c:1107
This suggests where the problem really ought to be fixed.
No point removing breakpoints after the inferior is dead.
generic_mourn_inferior arranges to mark all breakpoints
as uninserted.
Try moving remove_thread_event_breakpoints below the call
to target_beneath->to_mourn_inferior ().
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-20 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-17 15:35 Girish Shilamkar
2006-01-17 15:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-18 9:11 ` Girish Shilamkar
2006-01-18 13:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-20 14:14 ` Girish Shilamkar
2006-01-20 14:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-01-23 9:21 ` Girish Shilamkar
2006-01-24 21:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060120143507.GA2794@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=girish@linsyssoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox