Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Girish Shilamkar <girish@linsyssoft.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] Mark the thread_event breakpoint as "not inserted" 	before   calling thread_mourn_inferior
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060120143507.GA2794@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1137766638.3225.40.camel@krypton>

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:47:18PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> > As I suspected something is wrong with your host system, kernel,
> > environment, or similar.  You may want to try a few others.
> 	Thanks for the reply. I tried gdb-6.4 on Fedora Core 3 & 4 and always
> saw that problem. I further tried gdb-6.3 on the same m/c with same
> configuration (only the gdb had changed )on which I had seen this
> problem and it worked fine. 
> 	Then while investigating further about the different behaviour of the
> two gdb's i.e. gdb-6.3 and gdb-6.4 I found one difference that gdb-6.3
> doesn't have a function called thread_db_xfer_partial.
> 
> 	The following call trace is same for both the gdbs 

You left out the interesting part of the trace; why is it fetching
registers?  My GDB doesn't.  Presumably this is something specific to
Red Hat's libthread_db.  Does td_thr_validate_p return TD_OK for a
thread which is actually dead?

> #14 0x081305e0 in memory_remove_breakpoint (addr=4626416,
>             contents_cache=0x95a7618 "U") at ../../src/gdb/mem-
> break.c:91
> #15 0x080cffdd in remove_breakpoint (b=0x95a7600, is=mark_inserted)
>     at ../../src/gdb/breakpoint.c:1452
> #16 0x080d82aa in delete_breakpoint (bpt=0x95a7558)
>         at ../../src/gdb/breakpoint.c:6772
> #17 0x080d4258 in remove_thread_event_breakpoints ()
>             at ../../src/gdb/breakpoint.c:4295
> #18 0x08096875 in thread_db_mourn_inferior ()
>                 at ../../src/gdb/linux-thread-db.c:1107

This suggests where the problem really ought to be fixed.
No point removing breakpoints after the inferior is dead.
generic_mourn_inferior arranges to mark all breakpoints
as uninserted.

Try moving remove_thread_event_breakpoints below the call
to target_beneath->to_mourn_inferior ().

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-20 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-17 15:35 Girish Shilamkar
2006-01-17 15:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-18  9:11   ` Girish Shilamkar
2006-01-18 13:57     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-20 14:14       ` Girish Shilamkar
2006-01-20 14:35         ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-01-23  9:21           ` Girish Shilamkar
2006-01-24 21:52             ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060120143507.GA2794@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=girish@linsyssoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox