From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31639 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2006 19:35:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 31587 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jan 2006 19:35:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:35:01 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0HJWWOX016971; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:32:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0HJWW0U011339; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:32:32 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0HJWV8Q019964; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:32:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:35:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200601171932.k0HJWV8Q019964@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: jimb@red-bean.com CC: mark@codesourcery.com, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <8f2776cb0601162210r21ea2310u2e5665cfa40328d2@mail.gmail.com> (message from Jim Blandy on Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:10:42 -0800) Subject: Re: PATCH: Regenerate aclocal.m4 References: <200601162216.k0GMGdI5023240@sethra.codesourcery.com> <20060116221829.GA15449@nevyn.them.org> <43CC2000.1070507@codesourcery.com> <8f2776cb0601162210r21ea2310u2e5665cfa40328d2@mail.gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:10:42 -0800 > From: Jim Blandy > > I thought regenerating aclocal.m4 and friends with the same version of > autoconf / automake is considered an obvious fix. Is that not so? Sure, but it sometimes is a bit unclear what the right version of autoconf/automake is. AFAIK we only state the minimum version to use. And then of course sometimes people install patched versions, or have additional automake/autoconf macros installed on their systems. It's a bit of mess really, so I can understan Mark asking for an ok. Mark