From: Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, kevinb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()' (Revised)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601161915.54240.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601132105.k0DL5ZcF011764@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1726 bytes --]
Mark,
I have made the modifications you asked for.
I would have committed the patch, but I wanted to give you a chance to see if my new variable name was ok: fr became curfrm.
It's still a little criptic, but I was trying to avoid making the condition of an 'if' statement be on two lines.
OK to commit?
I am also concerned about this:
> [ Bleah, I'd really wish people stopped sending MIME mail, especially
> with that stupid quoted-printable encoding. I hate editing out all
> those gratuitous equal signs. ]
>
> > 2006-01-11 Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
> >
> > * ppc-tdep.h: Add a define for the hard limit used when scanning an
> > epilogue.
> > * rs6000-tdep.c: Add new subroutine, 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()'
> > and put it into the architecture vector.
>
> It's probably your stupid mailer that converts tabs into spaces or
> something, but please make sure the indentation of your Changelog
> entry is ok.
>
The mailer I am using is 'kmail'. Here is what I get if I say 'kmail -v':
Qt: 3.3.1
KDE: 3.2.1
KMail: 1.6.2
I viewed the source of my previous message and I have to agree: Bleah!!
What mailer whould you suggest? What mailer do you use?
In the Settings, I see I have a choice between "Allow 8-bit" or "MIME Compliant (Quoted Printable)". For this message
I used "Allow 8-bit". I hope this does a better job. If not, I'll have to change mailers.
I thought MIME was the standard though. Is that not the case?
Also, the attachment on my previous message claims to be "text/x-diff". I changed this one to "text/plain". Did that make
any difference for you?
I really appreciate your help in getting all this stuff 'right'.
-=# Paul #=-
[-- Attachment #2: watch-locals.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4912 bytes --]
2006-01-16 Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
* ppc-tdep.h (PPC_MAX_EPILOGUE_INSTRUCTIONS): New define.
* rs6000-tdep.c (insn_changes_sp_or_jumps)
(rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p): New functions.
(rs6000_gdbarch_init): Set in_function_epilogue_p.
Index: ppc-tdep.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/ppc-tdep.h,v
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -a -u -r1.48 ppc-tdep.h
--- ppc-tdep.h 28 Oct 2005 18:23:32 -0000 1.48
+++ ppc-tdep.h 17 Jan 2006 02:14:16 -0000
@@ -384,4 +384,7 @@
/* Instruction size. */
#define PPC_INSN_SIZE 4
+/* Estimate for the maximum number of instrctions in a function epilogue. */
+#define PPC_MAX_EPILOGUE_INSTRUCTIONS 52
+
#endif /* ppc-tdep.h */
Index: rs6000-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.248
diff -a -u -r1.248 rs6000-tdep.c
--- rs6000-tdep.c 1 Nov 2005 19:32:36 -0000 1.248
+++ rs6000-tdep.c 17 Jan 2006 02:14:21 -0000
@@ -502,6 +502,108 @@
return pc;
}
+static int
+insn_changes_sp_or_jumps (unsigned long insn)
+{
+ int opcode = (insn >> 26) & 0x03f;
+ int sd = (insn >> 21) & 0x01f;
+ int a = (insn >> 16) & 0x01f;
+ int subcode = (insn >> 1) & 0x3ff;
+
+ /* Changes the stack pointer. */
+
+ /* NOTE: There are many ways to change the value of a given register.
+ The ways below are those used when the register is R1, the SP,
+ in a funtion's epilogue. */
+
+ if (opcode == 31 && subcode == 444 && a == 1)
+ return 1; /* mr R1,Rn */
+ if (opcode == 14 && sd == 1)
+ return 1; /* addi R1,Rn,simm */
+ if (opcode == 58 && sd == 1)
+ return 1; /* ld R1,ds(Rn) */
+
+ /* Transfers control. */
+
+ if (opcode == 18)
+ return 1; /* b */
+ if (opcode == 16)
+ return 1; /* bc */
+ if (opcode == 19 && subcode == 16)
+ return 1; /* bclr */
+ if (opcode == 19 && subcode == 528)
+ return 1; /* bcctr */
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Return true if we are in the function's epilogue, i.e. after the
+ instruction that destroyed the function's stack frame.
+
+ 1) scan forward from the point of execution:
+ a) If you find an instruction that modifies the stack pointer
+ or transfers control (except a return), execution is not in
+ an epilogue, return.
+ b) Stop scanning if you find a return instruction or reach the
+ end of the function or reach the hard limit for the size of
+ an epilogue.
+ 2) scan backward from the point of execution:
+ a) If you find an instruction that modifies the stack pointer,
+ execution *is* in an epilogue, return.
+ b) Stop scanning if you reach an instruction that transfers
+ control or the beginning of the function or reach the hard
+ limit for the size of an epilogue. */
+
+static int
+rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
+{
+ bfd_byte insn_buf[PPC_INSN_SIZE];
+ CORE_ADDR scan_pc, func_start, func_end, epilogue_start, epilogue_end;
+ unsigned long insn;
+ struct frame_info *curfrm;
+
+ /* Find the search limits based on function boundaries and hard limit. */
+
+ if (!find_pc_partial_function (pc, NULL, &func_start, &func_end))
+ return 0;
+
+ epilogue_start = pc - PPC_MAX_EPILOGUE_INSTRUCTIONS * PPC_INSN_SIZE;
+ if (epilogue_start < func_start) epilogue_start = func_start;
+
+ epilogue_end = pc + PPC_MAX_EPILOGUE_INSTRUCTIONS * PPC_INSN_SIZE;
+ if (epilogue_end > func_end) epilogue_end = func_end;
+
+ curfrm = get_current_frame ();
+
+ /* Scan forward until next 'blr'. */
+
+ for (scan_pc = pc; scan_pc < epilogue_end; scan_pc += PPC_INSN_SIZE)
+ {
+ if (!safe_frame_unwind_memory (curfrm, scan_pc, insn_buf, PPC_INSN_SIZE))
+ return 0;
+ insn = extract_signed_integer (insn_buf, PPC_INSN_SIZE);
+ if (insn == 0x4e800020)
+ break;
+ if (insn_changes_sp_or_jumps (insn))
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Scan backward until adjustment to stack pointer (R1). */
+
+ for (scan_pc = pc - PPC_INSN_SIZE;
+ scan_pc >= epilogue_start;
+ scan_pc -= PPC_INSN_SIZE)
+ {
+ if (!safe_frame_unwind_memory (curfrm, scan_pc, insn_buf, PPC_INSN_SIZE))
+ return 0;
+ insn = extract_signed_integer (insn_buf, PPC_INSN_SIZE);
+ if (insn_changes_sp_or_jumps (insn))
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* Fill in fi->saved_regs */
@@ -3342,6 +3444,8 @@
set_gdbarch_deprecated_extract_struct_value_address (gdbarch, rs6000_extract_struct_value_address);
set_gdbarch_skip_prologue (gdbarch, rs6000_skip_prologue);
+ set_gdbarch_in_function_epilogue_p (gdbarch, rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p);
+
set_gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, core_addr_lessthan);
set_gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc (gdbarch, rs6000_breakpoint_from_pc);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-17 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-30 23:56 [PATCH] add 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()' Paul Gilliam
2005-12-01 5:21 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-01 18:27 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-12-01 20:14 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-12-02 1:13 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-02 1:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-02 20:12 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-12-02 20:17 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-12-03 3:05 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-02 23:38 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-04 20:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-04 18:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-04 20:48 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-04 21:12 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-04 21:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-04 21:22 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-02 4:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-12-02 18:44 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-12-02 19:15 ` [PATCH] add 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()' (Revised) Paul Gilliam
2005-12-02 20:28 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-12-02 21:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-02 21:21 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-12-03 4:53 ` [PATCH] add 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()' (Revised, again) Paul Gilliam
2005-12-03 5:43 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-12-02 21:44 ` [PATCH] add 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()' (Revised) Kevin Buettner
2005-12-06 15:20 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-12-06 15:15 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-12-08 4:42 ` Kevin Buettner
2006-01-11 17:44 ` Paul Gilliam
2006-01-12 0:12 ` Paul Gilliam
2006-01-12 23:53 ` Paul Gilliam
2006-01-13 21:05 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-01-17 3:46 ` Paul Gilliam [this message]
2006-01-17 19:29 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-09 17:46 ` Kevin Buettner
2005-12-02 22:19 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-02 22:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-02 23:20 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-03 12:48 ` Paul Gilliam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200601161915.54240.pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
--to=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox