From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14596 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2006 03:33:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 14587 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2006 03:33:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.fr (HELO smtp5.wanadoo.fr) (193.252.22.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:33:21 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0512.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CB3F41C0022B for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:33:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (AStDenis-105-1-23-52.w81-248.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.248.235.52]) by mwinf0512.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 671BD1C00220; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:33:18 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20060114033318422.671BD1C00220@mwinf0512.wanadoo.fr Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 7D04847E7B; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:33:15 +0400 (RET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:33:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] New inf-procfs module (replacing procfs) Message-ID: <20060114033315.GL10275@adacore.com> References: <20060113173921.GJ10275@adacore.com> <200601132027.k0DKRvSf021579@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601132027.k0DKRvSf021579@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00151.txt.bz2 Hi Mark, > It'd be great if you would be willing to do the cleanup. If not, > could you give me two weeks to finish my (barely started) attempt to > do it? I think I can, if you tell me what you'd like to be done. Unfortunately, I am about to take a few days off sometimes soon (it will be the end of next week), and I will then be traveling so won't have time for it before the end of January. It's up to you: If you'd like to do it, then please do, my traveling in effect gives you the two weeks. Otherwise, you can leave it to me. I'm a bit concerned that I have a track record to forget things and never pick them up for a long time when I am forced to leave them.... (work pressure). You don't have to, but you can nag me. BTW: You didn't tell me whether I was on the right track or not... target-vector handling is something relatively new to me, believe it or not, so I had to study it a bit. Would you also recommend one thread-support code that follows the current standards? I agree that sol-threads could use a good cleanup, and I am interested in doing it. I think we should be able to get rid of things like: extern int procfs_suppress_run; at the very least. Thanks, -- Joel