From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10000 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2006 13:28:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 9992 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2006 13:28:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from svr68.ehostpros.com (HELO svr68.ehostpros.com) (67.15.48.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:28:30 +0000 Received: from [61.11.18.135] (helo=titan.linsyssoft.com) by svr68.ehostpros.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52) id 1Eurdp-0005xQ-Db; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 05:28:26 -0800 Received: from pythagoras.linsyssoft.com (pythagoras [192.168.1.3] (may be forged)) by titan.linsyssoft.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k06DFBb6004793; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:45:11 +0530 From: Amit Kale To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Breakpoints in constructors Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:28:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200601031835.45731.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601061858.19927.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 04 Jan 2006 12:23 am, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Amit Kale > > Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:35:45 +0530 > > > > I've rebased the breakpoints in constructors patch to current cvs. It's > > attached for reviews and a submission into mainline gdb after any > > modifications/improvements as per gdb gurus' suggestions. > > Thanks. > > Do we need to say something about this in the docs? Yes. My patch causes gdb to place multiple breakpoints when user specifies a breakpoint on a constructor. DanielJ has suggested another approach where a breakpoint could refer to multiple locations. > > We certainly should mention this improvement in NEWS, however. Sorry. Not yet. My patch failed on some gdb tests. Please read my reply to DanielJ's email for more info. -Amit