From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14437 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2005 16:13:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 14430 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Dec 2005 16:13:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:13:48 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EqC1U-00033Y-Qn; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:13:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl Subject: Re: [RFA] Linux Checkpoints, take 3 Message-ID: <20051224161331.GA11718@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl References: <43AC7D2E.6020609@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 10:07:14AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > ! /* Detach new forked process? */ > > ! if (detach_fork) > > { > > ! if (debug_linux_nat) > > ! { > > ! target_terminal_ours (); > > ! fprintf_filtered (gdb_stdlog, > > ! "Detaching after fork from child process %d.\n", > > ! child_pid); > > ! } > > Might as well mark strings with _(), as long as we are changing the > code. We've discussed this before, but I don't remember the conclusion - is there benefit to translating debug messages not intended for users? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC