From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9744 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2005 05:46:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 9737 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2005 05:46:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ausmtp03.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp03.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:46:46 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp03.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBE5njV1087280 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:49:45 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.244]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jBE5nXsZ195740 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:49:33 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBE5kSQe032621 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:46:29 +1100 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.190.163.12]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBE5kS0b032607; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:46:28 +1100 Received: by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 913187373D; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:47:09 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:10:00 -0000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Wu Zhou Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, bje@au1.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised Message-ID: <20051214054531.GB24121@krispykreme> References: <20051206202848.GA9568@nevyn.them.org> <20051209050132.GA5325@nevyn.them.org> <20051210044752.GA30979@nevyn.them.org> <20051213203546.GA11674@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 > Sorry, I don't know much about different PPC processors. My knowledge > about DABR is from the publically available PowerPC programming environment > manual. That book said that PowerPC has one optional DABR register. And > the kernel is also coding like that. > > Anton, do you have any comment on this question? Yeah, we cant assume we have only one data breakpoint register - I think some of the 32bit cpus have multiple ones. Anton