Re: [linux] Always ignore restart/cancellation signals

Mark Kettenis
2005-12-09T21:55:14Z

> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:52:10 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:49:05PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Ah yes, it all comes back to me. Believe SIGRTMIN will be 32, unless
> > you link your stuff with libpthreads, since that consumes two signals
> > for internal use, and therefore SIGRTMIN will be 34. Are the signal
>
> Nowadays I believe they are always reserved; it's valid to dlopen
> libpthread.so.
>
> > numbers hardcoded in libpthread (in particular the NPTL one) or does
> > it depend on whether there are other consumers of real-time signals?
>
> They're hardcoded.

Then it has my blessing ;-).

Mark