Re: [linux] Always ignore restart/cancellation signals

Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-09T19:36:22Z

> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:58:10 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> If the thread library is kind enough to tell us which signals it is
> using, then we use those numbers. If it isn't, we must guess. The
> only correct guess is __SIGRTMIN (32 on all Linux systems, and this is
> Linux-specific code...) and __SIGRTMIN+1.

So you are saying that we should use __SIGRTMIN if we have no better
way of telling which signals are used, yes? I agree.