From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23859 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2005 21:55:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 23852 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2005 21:55:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:55:13 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jB9LsdtX013020; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 22:54:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jB9Lsdjq012997; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 22:54:39 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jB9LscFJ017427; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 22:54:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:47:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200512092154.jB9LscFJ017427@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20051209205210.GA21244@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:52:10 -0500) Subject: Re: [linux] Always ignore restart/cancellation signals References: <200512081950.jB8Jo9im029464@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051208133824.24b4c680@ironwood.lan> <20051208204301.GA29490@nevyn.them.org> <20051209143451.GA11917@nevyn.them.org> <20051209144651.GA12425@nevyn.them.org> <20051209185810.GA18701@nevyn.them.org> <200512092049.jB9Kn59V026226@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051209205210.GA21244@nevyn.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:52:10 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:49:05PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Ah yes, it all comes back to me. Believe SIGRTMIN will be 32, unless > > you link your stuff with libpthreads, since that consumes two signals > > for internal use, and therefore SIGRTMIN will be 34. Are the signal > > Nowadays I believe they are always reserved; it's valid to dlopen > libpthread.so. > > > numbers hardcoded in libpthread (in particular the NPTL one) or does > > it depend on whether there are other consumers of real-time signals? > > They're hardcoded. Then it has my blessing ;-). Mark