From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23819 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2005 09:48:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 23812 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Dec 2005 09:48:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:48:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A484E48CE9E; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:48:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29872-01-9; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:48:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (takamaka.act-europe.fr [212.157.227.139]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362F748CBF9; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:48:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 6D1C747E79; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:48:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Randolph Chung Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [hpux/committed] Fix segfault in SOM section handling Message-ID: <20051208094835.GA967@adacore.com> References: <43977C0C.8060301@tausq.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43977C0C.8060301@tausq.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2 Hi Randolph, On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:19:24AM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote: > On 32-bit hpux we were not properly reading symfiles and iterating over > sections that don't exist. This caused segfaults when, for example, we > try to debug gdb with itself. Fixed with the attached patch. committed > as obvious. I also propose that this patch be applied to the branch. What do you think? Thanks, -- Joel