From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7401 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2005 20:33:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 7393 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Dec 2005 20:33:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:33:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jB2KX2BT031194 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:33:02 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jB2KWvV26640 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:32:57 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-83.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.83]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jB2KWvT6014953 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:32:57 -0500 Received: from ironwood.lan (ironwood.lan [192.168.64.8]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jB2KWpFe014084 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:32:51 -0700 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:44:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()' (Revised) Message-ID: <20051202133250.10d687bd@ironwood.lan> In-Reply-To: <200512021120.22263.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> References: <200511301225.56802.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <8f2776cb0512011707p120df411w3a685c453d4ec625@mail.gmail.com> <200512021120.22263.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:20:22 -0800 Paul Gilliam wrote: > * rs6000-tdep.c: Add new subroutine, 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()' > and put it into the architecture vector. Your patch is okay to commit after you address Mark's concerns. Kevin