From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22977 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2005 17:35:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 22970 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Dec 2005 17:35:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:35:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jB2HZEqq027692 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:35:14 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jB2HZEV27297 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:35:14 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-83.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.83]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jB2HZET6016457 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:35:14 -0500 Received: from ironwood.lan (ironwood.lan [192.168.64.8]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jB2HZ8Ci013620 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:35:08 -0700 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:56:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit] Mention gdb-6.4 release in ChangeLog Message-ID: <20051202103508.228ae367@ironwood.lan> In-Reply-To: <20051202173036.GP1215@adacore.com> References: <20051202073638.GK1215@adacore.com> <20051202135437.GB5478@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0512020927p2652a411v7c4aa8bf3815914f@mail.gmail.com> <20051202173036.GP1215@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 09:30:36 -0800 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > People working quickly will definitely assume that whatever entry they > > come across first marks the branchpoint. > > > > I think we should have a single ChangeLog entry at the branchpoint, > > and include the release date in that ChangeLog entry: > > > > 2005-11-21 Joel Brobecker <...> > > > > * GDB 6.4 branch made. Released on 2005-12-02. > > That makes sense to me. If we agree, I can make the adjustment and > update the documentation. Jim's suggestion sounds good to me too. Kevin