From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26854 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2005 01:26:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 26841 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Dec 2005 01:26:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 01:26:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB3C48CE3B; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:26:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20303-01-4; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:26:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A5948CDA1; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:26:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 3B59847E79; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 17:26:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 04:02:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jim Blandy Cc: pgilliam@us.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()' Message-ID: <20051202012600.GA1215@adacore.com> References: <200511301225.56802.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <8f2776cb0512011707p120df411w3a685c453d4ec625@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0512011707p120df411w3a685c453d4ec625@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 > Paul wanted to fast-track this patch, in hopes it could get into the > 6.4 release. Joel, what are your thoughts? I think it's too late for 6.4, the cutoff time is just hours away. The bug seems to be minor too, so I don't think it's going to be so bad for 6.4. Eventually, if the maintainers agree to having this in 6.4.1, we can add it to the branch later. -- Joel