Re: [RFA] Fix gdb.asm/asm-source.exp for hppa64-hpux

Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-01T14:27:18Z

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:55:12PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> On 11/30/05, Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org> wrote:
> > > Is there a plausible place to put a comment explaining this constraint?
> >
> > I can add comments to common.inc, pa.inc/pa64.inc or asm-source.exp. Any
> > preferences?
>
> pa.inc/pa64.inc aren't good --- people working on other platforms will
> ignore those, but it's people on other platforms that we need to
> reach. common.inc seems like the right thing. If there were a
> skeleton .inc file, that'd be ideal.

I agree that common.inc is best.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC