Re: [PATCH] Target stderr not displayed thru MI

Denis PILAT
2005-12-05T09:43:51Z

Nick Roberts wrote:

>DP> I'm not sticked to have one more MI stream today since nobody
>DP> will use it efficiently, I just need to have at least target error
>DP> reported to a stream, even if it's the only mi stream available (mi->targ).
>
>Since no-one else appears to need another MI stream, or possibly even use MI
>for remote debugging, if we accept that adding a stream later may present
>compatibility problems, his original patch seems appropriate.
>
>
>
Nick,

Can I consider that my original patch
(http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-11/msg00497.html) is
accepted ?

Denis