Re: [RFC] DW_CFA_restore handling causes memory fault

Mark Kettenis
2005-11-25T21:26:25Z

> From: Frederic RISS <frederic.riss@st.com>
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:19:32 +0100
>
> On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 23:48 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Sorry to be such a prick, but could you change the message
> [...]
> > I think that's less confusing. With that change you've got my ok.
>
> Well I'm sorry that you have to rewrite my patch yourself :-)

No problem, I was feeling a bit guilty about not thinking about this
in the first place.

> I commited the attached patch containing your message to HEAD. Should
> that go to the 6.4 branch also ? BTW, what's the policy for patches
> being approved during the release process, do they have implicit
> approval for HEAD and the branch or does the latter require explicit
> approval ?

I'm not sure the branch is still open, but yes I think this should go
into 6.4 or 6.4.1. Joel?