From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32429 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2005 18:12:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 32421 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2005 18:12:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:12:55 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Efi41-0001D2-9w; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:12:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:35:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Frederic RISS Cc: Mark Kettenis , jimb@red-bean.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] DW_CFA_restore handling causes memory fault Message-ID: <20051125181249.GE736@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Frederic RISS , Mark Kettenis , jimb@red-bean.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <1132242850.8685.47.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> <8f2776cb0511171132x17fa4192u6ca5af71201e0be3@mail.gmail.com> <1132301881.8685.63.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> <8f2776cb0511180035ndadf290ta81520f75cf601d5@mail.gmail.com> <1132317183.8685.101.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> <200511181345.jAIDjZNc026609@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1132738531.7340.42.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> <200511242248.jAOMmCfC031451@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1132913972.13035.12.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1132913972.13035.12.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00463.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:19:32AM +0100, Frederic RISS wrote: > On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 23:48 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Sorry to be such a prick, but could you change the message > [...] > > I think that's less confusing. With that change you've got my ok. > > Well I'm sorry that you have to rewrite my patch yourself :-) > > I commited the attached patch containing your message to HEAD. Should > that go to the 6.4 branch also ? BTW, what's the policy for patches > being approved during the release process, do they have implicit > approval for HEAD and the branch or does the latter require explicit > approval ? It depends on where we are in the release I suppose; please ask Joel if you want this patch in 6.4. > 2005-11-25 Frederic Riss > > * dwarf2-frame.c: (execute_cfa_program): Don't access past the > allocated dwarf2_frame_state.initial.regs. FYI, stray colon there. I've removed it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC