From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22786 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2005 18:02:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 22779 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2005 18:02:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:02:16 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Efhtj-00015o-VB; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:02:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: christophe.lyon@st.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] add offset support to DWARF2_FRAME_REG_CFA Message-ID: <20051125180211.GC736@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , christophe.lyon@st.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4382E5B0.3030702@st.com> <200511221859.jAMIxvQv003229@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <43842C4F.8070405@st.com> <200511242237.jAOMbpxi014472@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511242237.jAOMbpxi014472@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:37:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Thanks! You seemed to have forgotten about my suggestion to introduce > DWARF2_FRAME_REG_CFA_OFFSET. The problem is that as-is, your patch > seems to break sparc64 and cris. By introducing > DWARF2_FRAME_CFA_OFFSET all existing code will be safe. You've already approved the patch with this change, so that's fine, but I don't follow your reasoning; why not just fix sparc64 and cris? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC