From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11712 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2005 19:36:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 11705 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2005 19:36:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:36:15 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAMJaAPA028927; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:36:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAMJaA3P001326; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:36:10 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jAMJa9OV007412; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:36:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:08:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200511221936.jAMJa9OV007412@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: brobecker@adacore.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20051122192034.GD11233@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:20:34 -0800) Subject: Re: [RFA] Copyright year in startup message ... References: <20051122192034.GD11233@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00420.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:20:34 -0800 > From: Joel Brobecker > > Mark just pointed out to me that the copyright year in the startup > message printed by GDB is still 2004. I think the year should be updated > at the begining of the year, at the same time as we rotate the ChangeLog. > Agreed? (in which case we should insert a section with the procedure to > follow at the start of each year) > > 2005-11-22 Joel Brobecker > > * top.c (print_gdb_version): Update copyright year. > > OK for mainline and branch? Sounds fine to me :). Mark