From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7595 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2005 16:24:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 7585 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2005 16:24:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:24:00 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Eeaw2-0004y3-2k; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:23:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Wu Zhou Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC]: Patch to support Fortran derived type - Revised Message-ID: <20051122162358.GA19024@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Wu Zhou , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:47:03PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote: > By the way, anyone has any idea or comments about the patch? I am more > than happy to improve it if you have any idea. > > According to the new maintenance policy, how long should I ping for my > un-reviewed patch. If it still gets no reply in a specified time, is > there anything I can do to get some attention, escalate this to the SC or > anything else? There is no new policy. It's a proposal, still under discussion. Even if it were adopted, escalating to the SC is almost never the right thing to do: the SC is completely uninvolved in day-to-day development. As always, I review code patches as frequently as I am able. I'll get to it. If any of the other global maintainers out there want to, of course, they're invited to review contributions too! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC