From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17394 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2005 14:58:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 17387 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2005 14:58:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:58:29 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jALEwOon011420; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:58:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jALEwNbk007900; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:58:23 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jALEwMqC018368; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:58:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:13:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200511211458.jALEwMqC018368@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: brobecker@adacore.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20051121072954.GB1635@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Sun, 20 Nov 2005 23:29:54 -0800) Subject: Re: [RFA] s/PIOD_WRITE_D/PIOD_WRITE_I in inf-ptrace.c References: <200511201312.jAKDCe8r008006@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051120160847.GA26558@nevyn.them.org> <20051121072954.GB1635@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00392.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 23:29:54 -0800 > From: Joel Brobecker > > > > I'd really like to see this change in GDB 6.4, because otherwise it > > > will not work at all on OpenBSD 3.9. But since the release of OpenBSD > > > 3.9 is still months ahead, having a GDB 6.4.1 with this issue fixed > > > would be fine for me too. > > > > I have no objection to putting this in 6.4. > > OK, but this has to be put in fast, because I was planning on cutting > the branch sometimes tomorrow evening, and make the first candidate > tarballs off that! I can delay the cut a few days if needed, no problem, > you just have to make sure I'm informed. Otherwise, we can also produce > a 6.4.1 a month or so after 6.4 if that makes things easier. Just let > me know. I committed it this morning to both mainline and the branch. Thanks, Mark