Re: [rfa/doc] Add section on interrupts to remote protocol documentation

Steven Johnson
2005-11-19T01:21:48Z

Jim Blandy wrote:

>On 11/18/05, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>>+@samp{Ctrl-C}, on the other hand, is defined and implemented for all
>>+transport mechanisms. It is represented by sending the single byte
>>+@code{0x03} without any of the usual packet overhead described in in
>>+the Overview section (@pxref{Overview}). When a @code{0x03} byte is
>>+transmitted as part of a packet, it is considered to be packet data
>>+and does @emph{not} represent an interrupt. E.g., an @samp{X} packet
>>+(@pxref{X packet}, used for binary downloads, may include an unescaped
>>+@code{0x03} as part of its packet.
>>
>>
>
>Yep, that's pretty explicit. Fine with me.
>
>
>
>
Ditto.