From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21376 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2005 15:33:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 21368 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2005 15:33:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:33:10 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ed8Ec-0002Zd-Ps; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:33:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew STUBBS Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] -nx-except-gdbtkinit option Message-ID: <20051118153306.GA9846@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew STUBBS , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <437B5ED3.70805@st.com> <437CB049.6060304@st.com> <20051117194639.GA20312@nevyn.them.org> <437DB85D.3000505@st.com> <437DC47B.1020608@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <437DC47B.1020608@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 12:09:31PM +0000, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >Would it make sense to not inhibit its loading under -nx? After all, > >we don't inhibit loading ~/.inputrc under -nx, right? Why should the > >toolkit be different? > > That would work fine for me. I don't know why it is any different, but > it is different and I didn't feel comfortable changing the default, let > alone removing the functionality altogether. This is probably a > discussion for the Insight list. I think I'll test the water. I like this suggestion better anyway. If Insight is compiled in, have it read its configuration. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC