From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1305 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2005 13:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1237 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Nov 2005 13:35:58 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:35:58 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EaCa6-0005a6-At; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:35:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew STUBBS Cc: Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [SH][PATCH] Disable ABI frame sniffer Message-ID: <20051110133508.GA21420@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew STUBBS , Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <43722DEF.8060300@st.com> <20051110012739.GA11334@nevyn.them.org> <43731D11.2050604@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43731D11.2050604@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 10:12:33AM +0000, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >It used to. I bet Andrew is submitting patches off of a GDB 6.3 or > >earlier port. In HEAD, errors during backtrace are non-fatal. > > Quite so. I have not forward ported our target backend and so cannot > test threads with HEAD. Not with SH OS21 anyway. > > Is it possible that the message is still present for SH and/or > non-standard threading implementations? The message is still _present_. It is no longer _fatal_, which is what you were complaining about with this patch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC