From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28384 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2005 20:35:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28374 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Oct 2005 20:35:57 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:35:57 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EWgNm-0001L7-10; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:35:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] Use -e instead of --entry for as in testsuite Message-ID: <20051031203553.GA5126@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200510312034.j9VKY5d3006611@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200510312034.j9VKY5d3006611@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:34:05PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > This is much more portable > > I threatened to put this in a long, long time ago, and nobody > objected. Finially did it. > > Mark > > > Index: ChangeLog > from Mark Kettenis > > * gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: Use -e instead of --entry. Is this more portable to any one system, in particular? If so could you write down in the test which one? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC