From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30058 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2005 20:38:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30047 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Oct 2005 20:38:46 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:38:46 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EOhwS-0002Ds-TR; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:38:44 -0400 Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite/ada] Test "set print array-indexes" with Ada arrays Message-ID: <20051009203844.GA8208@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20051005215942.GF1590@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051005215942.GF1590@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:59:42PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > Given the larger range of possible arrays that can be defined in Ada > compared to C, I wanted to add a new testcase for this recently added > feature using Ada code. It turned out to be a good idea, because I found > one bug. I can't look into it yet, but I created a PR. I'm still waiting > for the PR number to arrive, but here is the testcase. I will replace > the "????" by the actual PR number as soon as I receive my confirmation > email. In the meantime, I can use this testcase as the testcase for an > upcoming patch. It's 2018. We're still having trouble with email; I pinged overseers about this. > 2005-10-05 Joel Brobecker > > * gdb.ada/arrayidx/p.adb: New file. > * gdb.ada/arrayidx.exp: New testcase > > Tested on x86-linux. There are 12 PASSes, 2 FAILs, and 4 KFAILs. > The patch I'm about to submit will fix the 2 FAILs. > > OK to commit? This is OK, except that IIUC you've posted a patch to fix the KFAILs, so you can leave them out now. Right? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC