From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25735 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2005 15:38:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25694 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2005 15:38:08 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:38:08 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EL0U3-0002hh-7K; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:38:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: Make PowerPC backtraces more robust Message-ID: <20050929153807.GA8925@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050923193403.GA7146@nevyn.them.org> <20050928101000.0038099a@ironwood.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050928101000.0038099a@ironwood.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:10:00AM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: > It appears to me that func has already been computed earlier in this > function and that the value should be the same. > > The rest looks okay to me. Thanks for catching that. I've checked it in with the obvious correction. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC