From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10793 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2005 01:31:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10771 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2005 01:31:44 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 01:31:44 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EJhqI-0005sf-Rb; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 21:31:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 01:31:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Paul Brook Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Arm AAPCS support Message-ID: <20050926013142.GC22284@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Brook , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200509221721.02015.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509221721.02015.paul@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 05:21:01PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > The attached patch adds support for the AAPCS ABI (part of the Arm EABI). > > This is based on an earlier patch here: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2004-12/msg00358.html > Which was more-or-less approved, but I only just got round to updating it. > > The support for different elf header flags has already been merged separately. > This patch is the remaining procedure call interface bits. I've also > addressed the comments in the above mail. > > Tested with cross to arm-none-eabi. > Ok? Please fix one tiny thing for me first: > + # ARM FPA floating point numbers are not strictly little endian or big > + # endian, but a hybrid. They are in little endian format with the two > + # words swapped in big endian format. > + # EABI targets default to natural-endian VFP format Period at the end of that sentence. Otherwise OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC