From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27546 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2005 19:40:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27116 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Sep 2005 19:40:07 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:40:07 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EItOw-0002Ig-9v; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:40:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:40:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Dave Brolley Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch][rfa] Representation of ISA Attribute in CGEN Message-ID: <20050923194006.GA8783@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Brolley , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com References: <4334492B.8070003@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4334492B.8070003@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 02:27:55PM -0400, Dave Brolley wrote: > Hi, > > These changes have been in our local tree for a few years now and were > developed for an internal port which requires *much* more than 32 ISAs > or even 64 ISAs. These changes could be of benifit to others, so I would > like to submit them for approval. MAINTAINERS says: cgen/; cgen parts of opcodes/, sim/ & include/ cgen: http://sources.redhat.com/cgen/ Patches to cgen@sources.redhat.com May need separate opcodes/ or sim/ approval for commits of regenerated files there. Is that list still alive? If so, asking there may be more useful. I have no idea who can approve patches for cgen, but I think the gdb maintainers won't. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC