From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24482 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2005 19:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23940 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Sep 2005 19:33:43 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:33:43 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EHns3-0007Mw-ON; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:33:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] print arrays with indexes Message-ID: <20050920193339.GA28294@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050917215138.GB2496@adacore.com> <20050918034639.GB6990@nevyn.them.org> <20050918054109.GD2496@adacore.com> <20050918191943.GA27191@nevyn.them.org> <20050920073058.GR2496@adacore.com> <20050920193132.GY2496@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050920193132.GY2496@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:31:32PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > 1. If array size > threshold, then print indexes > > > 2. If array size < threshold, then print indexes > > > > The second, I think: it makes sense to ask for arrays that are not too > > large to be printed with additional info. > > This is fine with me. I'm confused. Wasn't Jim's point that he wanted "on for large arrays only, too ugly for small arrays"? Which is the first. It sounds like we have legitimate reasons for both thresholds. I'm getting more inclined to implement neither for now, to prevent confusion. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC