Attached is the patch I committed.  It just gets rid of the 'info powerpc' command prefix and patches the test
to use 'info vector' instead.

One question though:  I made an entry in the src/gdb/ChangeLog for the change to src/rs6000-tdep.c and one
in the src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog for for the change to altivec-regs.exp.  Was that the right way to do it?
Should I just have made one ChangeLog entry in src/gdb/ChangeLog?

-=# Paul #=-

On Friday 16 September 2005 12:47, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:50:12 -0700
> Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Ok, I agree.
> > 
> > Door 3 it is:  Do I need anymore more approvals to commit?
> 
> If I'm not mistaken, Daniel suggested just removing the "info powerpc"
> command.  Your no_more_altivec.patch does a bit more than this in that
> it deprecates this command as well.
> 
> I'm comfortable with a patch that removes the "info powerpc" command
> and updates the testsuite to use "info vector".  Consider such a patch
> as preapproved.  (But do post it to the list after committing it.)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Kevin
> 
>