From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9134 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2005 05:41:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8154 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Sep 2005 05:41:11 -0000 Received: from s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 05:41:11 +0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id A14DF47E75; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:41:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 05:41:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] print arrays with indexes Message-ID: <20050918054109.GD2496@adacore.com> References: <20050906202018.GC1153@adacore.com> <20050906205710.GA12715@nevyn.them.org> <20050907053951.GC1540@adacore.com> <20050907132316.GA3622@nevyn.them.org> <20050907202402.GF1540@adacore.com> <20050914171319.GD27542@adacore.com> <20050917204930.GB8777@nevyn.them.org> <20050917215138.GB2496@adacore.com> <20050918034639.GB6990@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050918034639.GB6990@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 > My first reaction was that it would be confusing. We'd have a variable > to hold the threshold, and it would always show up in "show" or "help" > output, but most of the time its value would be ignored. The trickier > something is to document accurately, the more likely it is to confuse > users. I also do not have a strong opinion, but I admit that having one knob seems a bit simpler to me (in terms of the user interface). -- Joel