From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13300 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2005 01:23:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13289 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Sep 2005 01:23:34 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 01:23:34 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EGnty-0008PY-Pf; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:23:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 01:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: dave.korn@artimi.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, me@cgf.cx Subject: Re: [PATCH] Your patch from 20050512 b0rked on cygwin! Message-ID: <20050918012330.GQ8777@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , dave.korn@artimi.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, me@cgf.cx References: <200508171907.j7HJ7Gq8024834@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508171907.j7HJ7Gq8024834@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 Dave, is Cygwin really still broken? I never saw a followup to this. On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:07:16PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > From: "Dave Korn" > > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:39:05 +0100 > > > > [Please keep me in the Cc: line, as I don't subscribe to gdb-patches] > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > Your patch to unconditionally include shared library code: > > > > Original patch - > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-05/msg00043.html > > Respin that went in - > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-05/msg00198.html > > > > ... appears to have borked cygwin. No criticism of yourself should be read > > into this fact: you did appeal for cygwin testing, and nobody stepped up to > > the plate, so I'm as much to mea culpa as anybody. > > Sorry 'bout that. [snip; see the archives] > > So I would appreciate a bit of review (and preferably from someone who > > knows better than me what's going on in this corner of the world!). > > Ideally, the cygwin shared library code would be converted to use the > solib.c mechanism. However, that's a bit more work, so I can image > we'd want this "quick" fix in first. But Chris Faylor is the > maintainer of this code, so you'll need his approval. Copying Chris, in case he didn't see the original. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC