From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22392 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2005 19:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21969 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Sep 2005 19:17:53 -0000 Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:17:53 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8FJHoq7029246; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:17:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8FJHou1015728; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:17:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8FJHlLX014993; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:17:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:18:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200509151917.j8FJHlLX014993@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: pgilliam@us.ibm.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200509141710.39794.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> (message from Paul Gilliam on Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:10:39 -0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH]*3 Re: [RFC] "info powerpc" References: <200509091633.02630.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <200509141710.39794.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00111.txt.bz2 > From: Paul Gilliam > Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:10:39 -0700 > > On Friday 09 September 2005 16:33, Paul Gilliam wrote: > > The "Info powerpc" command has no subcommands and does nothing. > > > > The testsuit tests "info powerpc altivec" > > > > So, should I depreciate 'info powerpc', just get rid of it, or add the 'altivec' subcommand and just point it to 'info vector'? > > > > -=# Paul #=- To be honest, from a multi-platform viewpoint, my favourite would be to get rid of "info powerpc" completely. But given the fact that we let the "info powerpc altivec" test slip into the testsuite, and you seem to like that command, I have no objection to make vector_info() non-static; your second patch seems too much of a kludge. Please try to get Andrew's or Kevin's approval though Mark