From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30559 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2005 23:52:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30542 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2005 23:52:10 -0000 Received: from eastrmmtao03.cox.net (HELO eastrmmtao03.cox.net) (68.230.240.36) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 23:52:10 +0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by eastrmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20050901235208.GIKJ29674.eastrmmtao03.cox.net@white>; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:52:08 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EAyqS-0002gE-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:51:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 23:52:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI testsuite to use PTY for inferior Message-ID: <20050901235148.GA10274@white> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050727031758.GA15798@white> <200508132151.j7DLpnoR015475@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050819222721.GA20029@white> <20050830025203.GA16646@nevyn.them.org> <20050901005200.GA6990@white> <200509012211.j81MBfX1004484@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509012211.j81MBfX1004484@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 > Fixes the problems in mi-console.exp, but I still see the following: > > 403-exec-continue > 403^running > (gdb) > FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.exp: testing exec continue > 403*stopped > (gdb) > 404-stack-list-frames 0 0 > 404^done,stack=[frame={level="0",addr="0x1c0006c8",func="main",file="../../../.. > /src/gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.c",fullname="/home/kettenis/src/gdb/g > db/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.c",line="14"}] > (gdb) > PASS: gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.exp: list stack frames > > Seems the attached patch solves those though. > > Mark O, great find Mark! I couldn't reproduce this, but now I see why the testcase is failing. It's also a case where multiple MI output commands were being matched in a single mi_gdb_test command. I wonder how my changes effected the testsuite to cause these problems? I'll take a look. Thanks a lot! Bob Rossi