From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32730 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2005 11:51:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32561 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Aug 2005 11:49:31 -0000 Received: from centrmmtao04vip.cox.net (HELO centrmmtao04.cox.net) (68.1.16.142) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:49:31 +0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by centrmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050812114930.HCXB137.centrmmtao04.cox.net@white>; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:49:30 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1E3Y2T-0002qW-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:49:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:05:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: MI output during program execution Message-ID: <20050812114929.GB10917@white> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050809181311.GB3012@white> <20050809223421.GB3557@white> <20050810004128.GA4264@nevyn.them.org> <20050810004826.GD3557@white> <2040BEEA-4200-4118-91EB-D093ED4D37A1@apple.com> <20050812012810.GA10011@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:43:19PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:28:10 -0400 > > From: Bob Rossi > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > > Thanks for all the guidence so far. Even though you have not attempted > > the observer approach, how do you feel about it? Is this something that > > you think could be accomplished with the current FSF GDB? Nick, Daniel > > and Eli, do you like this approach? > > The record will show that I dislike using observers in core GDB > sources (i.e. in the sources released with official GDB > distributions). But my opinions on this are usually voted down. I would like to become more educated on the pros/cons of the two possible approaches in solving this problem. What do you not like about the observer approach that the hook approach solves better? Bob Rossi