From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20064 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2005 02:37:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19390 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2005 02:36:52 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 02:36:52 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E2gSV-0001n2-0P; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 22:36:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 02:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Ingham Cc: Bob Rossi , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: MI output during program execution Message-ID: <20050810023646.GB6697@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Ingham , Bob Rossi , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <1123605445.30442.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <20050809175159.GA3012@white> <20050809182320.GC3012@white> <20050810004200.GB4264@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 05:48:18PM -0700, Jim Ingham wrote: > I agree, and it was filed as one by one of our users here... I > looked a bit into what it would take to fix it and it was not > pretty. Particularly for breakpoint commands, where it looked like > it would require some serious surgery. Yes, exactly. It requires an overhaul of the way we handle "what is the inferior doing", "what is the inferior supposed to be doing", and "what did the user ask us to do". -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC