From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24297 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2005 22:43:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24275 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2005 22:43:53 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:43:53 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E0oRL-0006Zd-Qr for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 18:43:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:43:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fully anchor mi_gdb_test expected results. Message-ID: <20050804224351.GA25174@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050804025045.GC32108@white> <20050804041121.GB29482@nevyn.them.org> <20050804140937.GB4054@white> <20050804141750.GA11536@nevyn.them.org> <20050804142601.GC4054@white> <20050804143238.GA11996@nevyn.them.org> <20050804203704.GA4472@white> <20050804205747.GA22030@nevyn.them.org> <20050804211834.GD4472@white> <20050804224044.GB4931@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050804224044.GB4931@white> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:40:44PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > Here are my testsuite results. The first one looks like a bug I > introduced, and the others look like random thread pass/failures. Is > that correct? Yes. Does removing two backslashes in sizeof.exp fix it? They shouldn't have been there at all. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC