From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5622 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2005 13:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5356 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2005 13:07:30 -0000 Received: from lakermmtao02.cox.net (HELO lakermmtao02.cox.net) (68.230.240.37) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:07:30 +0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050804130720.TXAN14195.lakermmtao02.cox.net@white> for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:07:20 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1E0fRQ-00014Z-00 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 09:07:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:07:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI testsuite to use PTY for inferior Message-ID: <20050804130719.GA4054@white> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050731012111.GB13808@nevyn.them.org> <20050803020653.GC29999@white> <20050803131900.GA5169@nevyn.them.org> <20050803182157.GA31469@white> <20050803182351.GB31469@white> <20050803183211.GA15118@nevyn.them.org> <20050803193122.GA31734@white> <20050804022344.GA32108@white> <20050804022659.GB32108@white> <20050804040526.GA29482@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050804040526.GA29482@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:05:26AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:26:59PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:23:44PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 03:31:22PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:32:11PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:23:51PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > > > > > Sorry, I'm a little trigger happy, here's the patch. > > > > > > > > > > Patch is OK with formatting corrections. > > > > > > > > Thanks Daniel, > > > > > > > > All applied, here's the patch. > > > > > > > > Bob Rossi > > > > > > Umm, I just reran the testsuite after I committed and I get, > > > > > > Running ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.exp ... > > > FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.exp: testing exec continue > > > FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.exp: list stack frames > > > > > > it's most likely this was me, but I just want to make sure someone isn't > > > pulling my chaing. > > > > Oops, ^^^^^^, very bad typo. Of course you know what I meant. > > > > Anyways, if I rerun this test, it pass's now. Is this another test that > > has random results? > > I've never seen it do that before; it's more likely that there's some > funny race condition in the new pty test code. Can you reproduce it, > say, by running the test a couple times in a row? No, it won't happen again for me, however, I'll keep an eye out for it, I run the tests often. Bob Rossi