From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16174 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2005 14:21:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16155 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2005 14:21:36 -0000 Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net (HELO eastrmmtao01.cox.net) (68.230.240.38) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:21:36 +0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050802142105.UOQQ12912.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@white> for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:21:05 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dzxe0-0007c3-00 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:21:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:21:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: mi_gdb_test MESSAGE parameter Message-ID: <20050802142124.GA28967@white> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050801183145.GA27427@white> <20050802030653.GB29761@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050802030653.GB29761@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:06:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:31:45PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is a pre-patch to my previous testsuite patch. I think it makes a > > lot of sense to make the MESSAGE parameter to mi_gdb_test necessary. > > There was only 1 testcase not using the MESSAGE parameter, and it was > > using it 1/2 the time. > > I agree. This is basically OK. Please fix two little things for me > and check it in. Committed, Thanks. Bob Rossi