From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30056 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2005 19:43:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29923 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2005 19:43:53 -0000 Received: from eastrmmtao05.cox.net (HELO eastrmmtao05.cox.net) (68.230.240.34) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 19:43:53 +0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by eastrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050801194339.CBIZ2947.eastrmmtao05.cox.net@white>; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:43:39 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DzgCK-0007ED-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:43:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 19:43:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Mark Kettenis Cc: drow@false.org, eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI testsuite to use PTY for inferior Message-ID: <20050801194340.GB27427@white> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , drow@false.org, eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050731012111.GB13808@nevyn.them.org> <20050731131653.GC22547@white> <20050731153051.GA28158@nevyn.them.org> <20050731212021.GA24144@white> <20050801113002.GB24853@white> <200508011901.j71J1i1w026583@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050801192545.GA17803@nevyn.them.org> <200508011934.j71JYMsk024168@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508011934.j71JYMsk024168@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:34:22PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:25:45 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:01:44PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:45:18 +0300 > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > > (Shrug) What about redirecting one of the streams to another file > > handle? I think any modern platform will support this. We could, for > > example, make this an option (it could be on by default if PTYs aren't > > supported). > > > > Terminals are quite different from "normal" pipes. For example stdio > > is line buffered for (pseudo) terminals but normally buffered for > > other streams. So this affects basically any program. > > Yes, but I think Eli's still basically right here: if you don't have > PTYs, then preserving terminal semantics isn't terribly important. > > Oh, yes. As long as it isn't the default, this certainly makes sense. > So anyone who cares about windows, feel free to implement this ;-). To me, it's more or less to hear a public profession of how GDB should work on windows. This allows me to change the way GDB works involving TTY's and not feel so bad. Bob Rossi