From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16640 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2005 21:49:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16623 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2005 21:49:17 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:49:17 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Dxtm3-0005UZ-EF; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:49:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:49:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: Bob Rossi , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: tests for MI commands Message-ID: <20050727214911.GA21072@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , Bob Rossi , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <17117.55351.716393.763492@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050724211946.GB798@nevyn.them.org> <17126.51233.887175.402254@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050727002721.GA27261@nevyn.them.org> <17126.62115.642102.742744@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050727035503.GA30670@nevyn.them.org> <17127.29797.456624.592127@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050727125049.GB16612@white> <17127.62451.799405.939345@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17127.62451.799405.939345@farnswood.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00212.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:52:03AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > I think that we should either remove them (my preference) or rewrite parts of > GDB so that the different MI levels act as independent interpreters (which > currently I am certainly not going to offer to do). If they were independent > then clearly changing the behaviour of the current level, as I have just done, > wouldn't break the tests for level 2. Incorrect. Please read again my description of how you broke the mi2 tests. It has nothing to do with your changes to the MI output and everything to do with your changes to the test cases. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC