From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21971 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2005 21:03:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21615 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2005 21:03:40 -0000 Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:03:40 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6RL3NsI027943; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:03:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RL3Mud004095; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:03:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6RL3HYf022581; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:03:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:03:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200507272103.j6RL3HYf022581@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: nickrob@snap.net.nz CC: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <17127.29797.456624.592127@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:47:49 +1200) Subject: Re: PATCH: tests for MI commands References: <17117.55351.716393.763492@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050724211946.GB798@nevyn.them.org> <17126.51233.887175.402254@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050727002721.GA27261@nevyn.them.org> <17126.62115.642102.742744@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050727035503.GA30670@nevyn.them.org> <17127.29797.456624.592127@farnswood.snap.net.nz> X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00210.txt.bz2 From: Nick Roberts Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:47:49 +1200 Given the scarce resources for this unpaid work I ask you again to consider removing the mi2-*.exp files and just test the current version of MI. The reality is that they serve no useful purpose (mi-*.exp tests would still pass if GDB was invoked with "-i=mi2") and they require effort that could be better spent on other things. We can discuss this *after* you either: a) Fixed the test failures. b) Backed out your patch. You promised not to do this again, and yet you did. Bad Nick, no cookie! Mark