From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17005 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2005 20:58:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16989 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jul 2005 20:58:42 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:58:42 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1DwnYW-0007tC-Ko; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:58:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tres Melton Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, John Mylchreest Subject: Re: gprof & Linux interaction oddity Message-ID: <20050724205840.GA30311@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tres Melton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, John Mylchreest References: <1122238617.10644.44.camel@thor.tres.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1122238617.10644.44.camel@thor.tres.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 Gprof has nothing to do with GDB, sorry. On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 02:56:57PM -0600, Tres Melton wrote: > One of the developers, Robert Love, has responded: "Explain why gprof > needs to know the _actual_ timing tick." I was hoping that you could > help me with that. I am inclined to agree with Robert, but I haven't investigated in depth, and don't care to. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC