From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10314 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2005 01:01:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10305 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2005 01:01:14 -0000 Received: from c-24-61-23-223.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (HELO cgf.cx) (24.61.23.223) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:01:14 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 92EFB4A879F; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 21:01:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:01:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Mark Mitchell , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, chet.ramey@case.edu Subject: Re: Guidance re. MinGW and readline Message-ID: <20050718010113.GA9444@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, chet.ramey@case.edu References: <42DAF4FE.3060609@codesourcery.com> <20050718002309.GA6458@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050718002309.GA6458@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 08:23:09PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 05:17:02PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> (2) I backport Chet's changes to rltty.c to the src/readline/ >> sourcebase, and then proceed as above. Because we know that these >> changes will be in readline-5.1, we needn't worry overmuch about >> divergence from upstread sources. > >This is the right way to do it, definitely. Ditto. cgf