From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2803 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2005 19:06:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2781 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jul 2005 19:06:10 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:06:10 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.51) id 1Dp9n7-0008Tj-6e; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:06:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Ben Elliston , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH Makefile.in Message-ID: <20050703190609.GK13811@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alexandre Oliva , Ben Elliston , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050630063814.A8532@mailhub.air.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 02:53:20PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jun 29, 2005, Ben Elliston wrote: > > > There is no longer an in-tree version of DejaGnu in src/dejagnu. This > > patch just keeps the gdb Makefile up to date. > > Not really. It has no advantage whatsoever for those who no longer > have dejagnu/runtest in their build trees, but it breaks for those who > happen to do. I don't think it's enough of a clean-up to be worth > the potential hassle. I don't want to carry this baggage around forever. We already rely on plenty of installed tools; I think it's long past time to add expect and dejagnu to the list. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC